Is not a Right to be heard. Rather it is something that is earned through years of careful deliberation and civil discourse.

This is something that often seems to be confused, ‘I have the right to speak,’ however, granted there is no Right being earned. This is something you see over a long period of time, the ones who remained quite out of fear of physical repercussions seems to flood out into the perception of everyone online. In person 80% of the communication happening is non-verbal through what is called Haptics.

Haptics are the non-verbal cues that we receive from the messenger, the one ‘sending’ the message tells us the true meaning of what they are trying to actually say. Perception becomes our individual reality, when we accept the totality of a message at face value. When we receive the message through non-verbal nodes of Communication. I.e.; instant messaging otherwise known as ‘text messaging’.

Text messaging really became popular in the mid to late nineties, through the ‘invention’ of the cellular phone, leading into the 21st century. It was the next ‘new’ thing, the latest of technological inventions that would shape the modern day era. It would mold a society into a self-reliant never ending wheel of greed and desire, everyone would be connected.

Granting the world the ability to openly share their ‘opinion.’Becoming angry when the opinion is rejected, rather that understanding that the difference in merely a subjective point of view of an objective reality.

This ‘view’ is often skewed and misunderstood by everyone, other than the one holding the opinion in the first place.

What makes this happen?

The lack of Communication, as defined by the non-verbal cues we must be able to receive in order to fully receive a message, at least as the sender intends it.

If 80% of communication, the “sending and receiving of messages,” is misunderstood because of the lack of non-verbal cues; then we would have to fully utilize our discernment in order to fully receive the message as the sender intends it.

You have to question the message, not the messenger. The messenger ‘believes’ that their meaning will be received.